|
|
|
|
|
by dkjaudyeqooe
856 days ago
|
|
> And now you have no ability to take those "rights" back using violence if you needed to. This is repeated a lot and shows that at bottom, gun ownership ideologues are violent thugs, they all promote using violence to impose their political views dressed up as a fight for "rights". Ultimately it proves that restrictive gun laws are absolutely correct. |
|
The entire purpose of the Second Amendment - at least in the United States - is to enable violent resistance against tyranny. Not hunting, not culling predators, not sport, not home defense.
> Ultimately it proves that restrictive gun laws are absolutely correct.
"We need to restrict something that prevents further restriction."
You need violence, firearms, and "violent thugs" to go around disarm people who possess them - this in Australia is the threat of prison time.
Pot, meet kettle?