|
|
|
|
|
by rcade
857 days ago
|
|
If someone wanted to extend OPML into another domain, even if they got others to agree on their proposed type value and the new attributes added to support that type, there's nothing to stop a collision with somebody else choosing the same attribute names. There also is nothing to stop the author of the OPML specification from opposing the new type. It would be far easier to create a new XML format. |
|