|
|
|
|
|
by ethbr1
861 days ago
|
|
I'd say the method that science becomes established is one of the problems, because a big chunk (50%?) of that process is non-scientific (political people processses). I'd feel a lot better if "established" meant something more like well-replicated (with an economic/academic model to support that). |
|
It's easier to be objective looking back, and all the entrenched interests hyping things or slandering things are usually gone or different.