[fbdab103]

Definitely use to fall for primitive obsession. It seemed so silly to wrap objects in an intermediary type.

After playing with Rust, I changed my tune. The type system just forces you into the correct path, that a lot of code became boring because you no longer had to second guess what-if scenarios.

[xboxnolifes]

> Definitely use to fall for primitive obsession. It seemed so silly to wrap objects in an intermediary type.

A lot of languages certainly don't make it easy. You shouldn't have to make a Username struct/class with a string field to have a typed username. You should be able to declare a type Username which is just a string under the hood, but with different associated functions.

[nogridbag]

We use this pattern extensively in a large Java app. As long as you establish these patterns early on in the project, the team adapts to the conventions. It's worked well for us and the lack of language support doesn't get in the way much.

[zeroCalories]

Yeah, modern type systems are game changers. I've soured on Rust, but if Go had the full Ocaml type system with match statements I think it would be the perfect language.

[kaba0]

Go would need such a revamp to be anywhere close to a decent language, that it would be just a straight up other language.