|
|
|
|
|
|
by saalweachter
864 days ago
|
|
|
It's a "stop shooting yourself in the foot" win-win. Like, the last time I did a back-of-the-envelope, physical spam mail was also a surprisingly large (but still tiny) fraction of US CO2 emissions. We could just stop sending spam mail, and save like a quarter percent of the US CO2. Not big, but you're also not losing anything of value. |
|
|