|
|
|
|
|
|
by davidrowley
861 days ago
|
|
|
There's some information about why that does not happen in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211104234742.ao2qzqf... In particular: > The immediate goal is to be able to generate JITed code/LLVM-IR that doesn't
> contain any absolute pointer values. If the generated code doesn't change
> regardless of any of the other contents of ExprEvalStep, we can still cache
> the JIT optimization / code emission steps - which are the expensive bits. A colleague is working on getting this patch into shape. So we might see some caching work get done after the relative pointer work is in. |
|
|