|
|
|
|
|
|
by seabass-labrax
864 days ago
|
|
|
The semantics are not very meaningful; I will concede that :) My point was simply that the concept of democracy isn't necessarily an obvious one. Perhaps in early 20th-century Italy, where there was still a technically supreme monarchy, and the tradition of democratic elections itself was only a few generations old, putting trust in one man alone (Mussolini) might have seemed reasonable or even ideal. |
|
|
Might have? Do we have evidence? And if it did, what do you conclude from that?
> the concept of democracy isn't necessarily an obvious one
Taking a vote is an obvious concept.