[neilv]

> It would defeat the purpose of putting a home in an llc for anonymity.

That's a legitimate desire, and I think we should make privacy and the motives behind it available to everyone, not only those who can afford the expense and effort to set up and maintain an LLC.

(I'd expect the solution to be a combination of changes: outlaw most data-brokering and trading of personal data, hold organizations responsible for the data they hold so much that they treat unnecessary personal data like an existential-threat toxic liability, change practices to make SWAT-ing not be such a risk even if some psycho did get hold of someone's address, hold demagogues responsible for using conspiracy theories they know are false to incite mentally ill people, and more.)

[phkahler]

>> It would defeat the purpose of putting a home in an llc for anonymity.

> That's a legitimate desire, and I think we should make privacy and the motives behind it available to everyone, not only those who can afford the expense and effort to set up and maintain an LLC.

I'm on the fence about that. Why should someone not be able to determine who owns a particular piece of property?

[lightweb]

SWATing. Security concerns for certain people.