|
|
|
|
|
by echelon
866 days ago
|
|
> as a result you say "I dont really recall..maybe I got a soda from there and dont remember?" [...] > today that statement would be used to show that you couldve been there (because you said so yourself). They can use "I don't remember" ? Isn't the whole point of interrogation to get a suspect to make conflicting statements, then pressure them when the statements don't line up as a means to get a confession? Why is this a bad thing? If this tool goes away, couldn't conviction rates plummet (for eg. violent crimes)? I'm having trouble seeing an ethical problem here? |
|
They absolutely can, and will use that in a court of law. Any comment that you make that seems completely fine from your perspective can quickly be turned around to lock you up.
I highly recommend checking out this lecture when you get a chance: https://youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Police are not generally concerned with getting the right person, they're just concerned with getting a person.