|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
871 days ago
|
|
> Can an LLM drive locomotion? Can't see any principled reason it couldn't, if it was a big enough, sufficiently trained one, running on fast-enough hardware, if you represent the sensor data in its token vocabulary, and have the reverse for control outputs. Quite probably not the most efficient way to drive locomotion, though. > I never understood AGI as generating sui generis ideas as a requirement. Creativity is among the applications of intelligence that I would deem included in the "G" in AGI; OTOH, like most proposed binary categories, its probably more useful to view generality as a matter of degree than a crisp binary attribute. |
|