Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
Russian cosmonaut sets record for most time in space – more than 878 days (reuters.com)
96 points by DaveFlater 868 days ago
12 comments

There seems to be some confusion in the comments. The cosmonaut didn't spend 878 days in space continuously but rather over 5 separate missions starting from 2008.

And he will reach 1110 days once he returns from the current mission in September.

Important note:

878 days in total, across all his expeditions. Not continuous.

The longest continuous stay of 473 days was by Valeri Polyakov on board the Mir station in 1994-95.

I am pretty sure this guy came to my french island in 1998 or 1999 when I was last year of high school (if it was not him, it was another cosmonaut who had done a very long stay, but I am pretty sure it was him). He came to visit my high school to give a talk. A close classmate, who was half Russian and could speak well the language, translated for us. Kind of cool :D
That first leg day is gonna be a real burner.
I had previously read that there was a point of no return for walking atrophy, somewhere before the two-year mark. Hope the medicine has improved, for this astrionaut's sake.
I'm sure that international space programs have figured out ways to mitigate atrophy by now.
They have not. The astronauts have to exercise for hours per day (2.5 last I checked) in specially designed systems, but that doesn't even begin to compare to what we experience just existing under 1g. So they do experience substantial atrophy and are initially unable to even walk without assistance after getting back to Earth.
And if this can’t be overcome, it means any alien visitors of significant physical size after years of space travel would be rendered quivering bodies after landing on earth —that’s probably a good thing :)
More seriously it actually has really interesting implications for Mars and any other sort of low-g colonization. People who are born and live in only such an environment may simply be physically incapable of coming back to Earth in anything like a normal fashion.

Imagine trying to go to a place right now where suddenly you weighed 3x as much. In all probability, you would die without some sort of special assistance - probably of some sort of cardiovascular failure. If you're a 180lb male, it's the equivalent of strapping a 360lb weight suit on yourself, with the relevant difference that lying down wouldn't offer even the slightest of respite from the forces being imposed on your body. It also has interesting implications for sports, which are just going to be awesome in low g. An Earther would have a massive and tremendously unfair advantage against a Martian.

There's going to be some dramatic (and rapid) social, physical, and even evolutionary drift.

Not an issue if they have a means of propulsion capable of delivering 1g the whole way

Which is necessary to go any meaningful distance in space anyway

True mitigation would be spin-wheel sleeping and standing. Basically a centrifuge with spacesuits at the end, so they sleep/train in simulated gravity. They do not have that on the iss- although the snake-robot crane could do the job.
Sitting at a desk for several years has wrecked me, I can’t imagine what zero g would be like to recover from.
you are supposed to gym between desks
Here is an interesting and relevant context: there is a huge amount of evidence that Roscosmos is taking an active part in the war effort. There is a great source about it from Eric Berger of Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/06/it-appears-that-roscos...

Take that into account when reading news made from state press-releases like the one in the post.

P.S.: For the full context, the Roscosmos ex-boss also has had his own private military company for a while.

I wish they would go into more detail regarding the health effects. Eyesight, bone density, cancher risks, etc. I think it helps to be older though, slow cell divide and regeneration, slow down even "aggressive cancers"
Do check out this study - NASA lucked out in having twin astronauts, one of whom spent nearly a year on the ISS while his brother stayed on Earth.

https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/twins-study/

> I think it helps to be older though, slow cell divide and regeneration, slow down even "aggressive cancers"

Are you suggesting that older people are less likely to get cancer?

My understanding was that cancer was mostly driven by the immune system's mechanisms for killing rogue cells failing. The assumption is that there's always cells doing things they shouldn't, it's when you fail to stop them it becomes a problem.

Currently reading 'A City On Mars', which takes a deeper dive into the effects of space on our bodies, as well as other caveats of settling beyond Earth(birth, disease, political systems, etc...). It is not comprehensive and that is because data is still very, very sparse for space operations.
Though dated (1964) this research report has some articles that might interest you

https://archive.org/details/parin-ed.-aviation-and-space-med...

Astronauts age slower and grow taller in space.
Due you mean in the Einstein "twin paradox" sense or are they actually aging significantly slower?
According to Wikipedia astronauts that spent about 800 days in space have aged about 20 milliseconds less. But I'm not sure if that's the correct phrasing and usage of word "age".
If you would consider someone who time traveled ten years into the future with magic to not be ten years older, then aged is correct.
What about, "has experienced ..." or "passed through 20 ms fewer"?
like hobbits drinking ent water
They forgot him. It's like The Terminal, but in space.
Can someone clever please do the math and figure out how far ahead in the future he is?
Just a fraction of a second. IIRC relativistic effects of being on the ISS are around 5 milliseconds/year.
It's a fair question, not sure why it's in gray. After all GPS calculations include corrections for relativistic effects.
Relativistic effects do not put you in the future - you still are here and now. You just arrive at "here and now" faster :)
With rent prices they way it is i can't blame him for not coming down
Hope the muscular atrophy isn't too bad when he returns.
I wouldn't return either.
A very small nitpick: "cosmonaut" implies a Russian astronaut [1].

Calling someone a "Russian cosmonaut" goes against the DRY principles ;)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut#Cosmonaut

Well actually... There have been non-Russian Soviet bloc cosmonauts.

For example —

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miros%C5%82aw_Hermaszewski

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Klimuk

> goes against the DRY principles ;)

Nitpicking, "DRY" is a principle, so you probably meant to say "goes against DRY ;)"

In Romanian and other languages "cosmonaut" and "astronaut" can be used interchangeably.
Same in Polish. Actually, in my childhood, some of which was still under communism, "cosmonaut" was in use, "astronaut" came in the 90s, with Hollywood movies.
IMO it's marginally useful to specify that he isn't Soviet or from another former Soviet country that uses the term