[GeekyBear]

I doubt that using a different proprietary locking connector fixes the "why didn't they use standard USB-C" complaint.

[voussoir]

That one does look like a proprietary design, but USB IF has a locking connector standard too! Makes it look like VGA.

https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/documents/usb_type-c...

[wtallis]

I love how they actually defined two mutually incompatible locking connectors in one document.

[sgerenser]

Looking at that elegant design, I can’t imagine why Apple didn’t use that. /s

[solardev]

Lol! I can't tell if that design is a parody. That's seriously the best they came up with?

[numpad0]

USB always had it, this isn't just what they came up with for USB-C. Panasonic Toughbooks have that single screw versions and matching gasket countersinking for USBs.

[solardev]

I guess I'm not really surprised, if this came from the same group who gave us USB 3.2.78 Fast Version Gen Z Type S.

[numpad0]

It just works. Proper screws just work. Latches has its own pros and cons, button-less latches like USB are technically even worse. It's just collective memory of cheapest parodies of these for VGAs never working that you have internalized.

[sgift]

Apple would be free to work on "more elegant" common standards instead of trying to force people into their ecosystem by using proprietary garbage, which then has to be forbidden by the EU yet again.