[dataangel]

It's a peer reviewed review listing a bunch of studies that according to the OP shouldn't exist so I think it's pretty relevant here.

[ta988]

You probably want to read Nelson 2017 cited in this post link to understand how more complicated tnan that the situation is.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975

[crackedbassoon]

Not saying it’s irrelevant (though non critical reviews like this are not very valuable), but the parent wrote “here is one”, as in here is a study. I’m pointing out is not a study.