[berkes]

Why is this "preposterous"? I never mentioned privacy, and certainly never claimed bitcoin provides it.

Also, bitcoin never claimed to enable privacy (contrary to monero and zcash). All it ever claimed was to be pseudonymous. It has been crystal clear to anyone in the field that "if people can link your addresses to your person, they know all your transactions". In fact, this has often been presented as a feature (though I personally don't really think it is a good one) in which e.g. all payments to and by a politician or NGO can be transparantly tracked by the public.

[unicornmama]

Nonsense. Satoshi’s Bitcoin white paper has a section on Privacy.

[berkes]

Almost a third of that chapter is explaining the shortcomings and caveats of the system.

> Some linking is still unavoidable with multi-input transactions, which necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner. The risk is that if the owner of a key is revealed, linking could reveal other transactions that belonged to the same owner.