|
|
|
|
|
by chaxor
867 days ago
|
|
I could be wrong here, but I believe this (ceph, et al) is the answer to the question:
> """But what if I don't have a JBOD of 6x18TB hard drives with good amount of ECC RAM for ZFS?
What if I have 3 raspberry pi 4's, at different houses with 3x 12TB externals on them, and 2 other computers with 2x 4TB externals on them, and I want to use that all together with some redundancy/error checking?"
That would give (3x3x12)+(2x2x4)=124 TB of storage, vs 108TB in the ZFS single box case (of raw storage). If you could figure out the distributed part (and inconsistency in disk size and such), then this is a very nice system to have. |
|
Ceph is nice, but performance is lackluster on anything but a proper cluster (pun intended).
It's also somewhat heavyweight. I ran ZFS over iSCSI with four RPis serving the iSCSI targets via SATA-USB. It was network limited mostly. The advantage of that is that you can take the same disks and plug them all into a single host and import the pool directly (ie not via iSCSI), if needed.