|
|
|
|
|
by fragmede
871 days ago
|
|
Maybe not typical, but you must know somebody who doesn't suffer from ADHD levels of distraction or an inability to cope with sensory input from autism. like you said, it's a distribution and it's important to recognize that there exist people that trend towards the typical end of the spectrum and aren't severely afflicted by mental illnesses the way some people are. given that there are people with one testicle and other people with one ovary, the average is probably less than one for both. |
|
To strip out the math metaphor in case it's unhelpful, there is no single way to be a normal or typical person, there are many ways. At first approximation you could think of them as being different archetypes (that metaphor ultimately suffers the same problem that I'm describing with "neurotypical", but just to illustrate). They aren't better or worse, just different. The problem isn't that someone is one type or another, but that the differences lead to confusion and miscommunication.
> given that there are people with one testicle and other people with one ovary, the average is probably less than one for both.
What do you think would happen if we rounded fractional values, given we're talking about something quantized?