|
|
|
|
|
by tivert
874 days ago
|
|
> So why not just grant H1-Bs to the companies that are willing to pay their talent the most? As others have pointed out, you're assuming highest salary == most valuable, but what your idea will lead to is a bunch of talented people working on new ways to get people to click ads or write yet-another trading algorithm. IMHO, you'd fix the H1-B program by doing two things: 1. Eliminate the requirement that the visa-holder have a sponsor past the start date, so the they can quit immediately and take a different job if they are underpaid or the working conditions are poor. That will eliminate any potential exploitation enforced by the program. 2. Limit the sponsors to legitimate US-based companies who will employ the workers for in-house work. Working out a precise definition may be hard, but it should be possible because it's pretty clear when we see it. Basically, something to prevent foreign contracting/outsourcing companies from even using the program. |
|
A lot of the appeal of an immigrant is that they can't quit or take a better deal.