Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by csdvrx 871 days ago
> because Ubicloud needs to grow its own copy-on-write features for block device snapshots, things we lack today.

Just, why? CoW (or your own CoA) are ripe with performance problems. How exactly do you benefit from their use?
1 comments
fdr 871 days ago
The GitHub image is 86GB and people want an action VM to start reasonably quickly, so a full copy for every run isn’t going to work so well.

As a side note, isn’t it nuts that GHA operates on a principle of “installing the universe” (and apparently the universe is 86GB) and updating about every week, and it’s not total chaos? I was surprised, but it seems to work.

link
k8svet 871 days ago
> As a side note, isn’t it nuts that GHA operates on a principle of “installing the universe” (and apparently the universe is 86GB) and updating about every week, and it’s not total chaos? I was surprised, but it seems to work.

As someone who has authored a GitHub Action to delete like 85% of the hodge-podge stuff blasted all over in a default runner image to free up more space for a Nix store. It's "nuts" indeed.

link
maxloh 871 days ago
Any GitHub link for your code?
link