|
|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
874 days ago
|
|
|
I recognise the point, but also > - drinking glass that is 99% hole-free This describes my travel flask when the screw cap is on and the slot in the cap is open; most of my drinking glasses have (and need) a much bigger hole-to-surface ratio to get the fluid in and for me to drink from. More relevantly for the output of an AI: in cases where testing is easy, a system which has a 99% chance of a producing a saleable drinking glass and just discards the other 1% to recycling isn't unreasonable… provided you can be sufficiently confident about the test. For AI, the quality of the automated tests of the output is a very solid "it depends on what you're doing". |
|
|