Society would change a hell of a lot faster if people thought about ethics instead of inheriting their morality, as the latter just seems to mostly be "I find objectionable what my parents found objectionable".
When I had to do this, I came to some distasteful to me conclusions, eg that two adult siblings should be free to have protected sex. I just didn't see any way to justify not allowing that. Not many people do this.
but morality was invented to help social apes mediate. why would you invent a set of beliefs no one agrees with? the purpose is consensus and predictability and alignment with biological programming.
i dont want to know "ethical people" who have academic beliefs about incest
When I had to do this, I came to some distasteful to me conclusions, eg that two adult siblings should be free to have protected sex. I just didn't see any way to justify not allowing that. Not many people do this.