Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jinjin2 873 days ago
This paternity worry seems to be a leftover of agrarian societies where it is important to ensure inheritance. In tribal societies, as we lived for millenia, it was much less of a worry as raising the kids was a tribal concern.

There is a famous quote from a Montagnais Native American to a Jesuit priest that tries to tell him that he should prevent his wife from having other relationships or he would risk bringing up another mans child: "Thou hast no sense. You french people love only your own children; but we love all the children of our tribe" - https://sexgendersoc.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/4-montagnai...

2 comments

Tribal or not, Paternal worry is also fundamental genetic strategy if you spend any resources caring for your children, as many mammals do.

The person who raises only others children is not longer expressed in the gene line

If the tribe is closely related, it can be a good strategy as a large part of their genes would still spread
sure, but the returns quickly diminish with relatedness. A child is worth two nephews/nieces, 8 first cousins once removed, or 32 second cousins once removed.

https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_DNA_statistics

That's assuming none of your nephews or first cousins never reproduce with each other down the line. Also consider it's not exactly your dna you are trying to pass on but your families. Then you are someone's child and nephew etc and those people want there genes passed on just as much as you do. So by raising others in the local community you help pass on your father's or uncle's DNA.
This gets brought up to explain why homosexuality is partially genetic and the math just does not work out.
> You french people love only your own children; but we love all the children of our tribe

It's not just about loving your children, but also about feeding them. Children can't survive on love alone.

I guess the point here is that the tribe feeds the children. It is not up to the parents alone.