|
|
|
|
|
by diggan
872 days ago
|
|
By that definition, almost no software in Debian could be called "stable", as most software has at least one known bug. When people talk about "stableness" and distributions, we're usually referring to the stableness of interfaces offered by the distribution together with the package. > There's really no reason at all to use such an old version Sometimes though, there is. And for those people, they can use the distribution they wish. If you want to get the latest versions via a package repository, use a package repository that fits with what you want. But you cannot dictate what others need or want. That's why there is a choice in the first place. |
|
But you're right people are free to choose. Every version is still available on the Caddy GitHub releases page for example. What's being talked about here is the default behavior not aligning with the promise of being a maintained release, instead being full of security holes and known major bugs. It's unrelated to whether Debian is a stable or rolling distro rather about the lack of patches they carry for their version.