Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 876 days ago
It comes from a time before websites sucked because they are overloaded with ads ads and tracking.

For non-interactively retrieving a single page of HTML, or some other resource, such as a video, or retrieving 100 pages, or 100 videos, in a single TCP connection, without any ads or tracking, HTTP/3 is overkill. It's more complex and it's slower than HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1.

1 comments

I have a domestic web server, I did implement its code, and the most important was HTTP1.[01] to be very simple to implement, that to lower the cost of implementing my real-life HTTP1.[01] alternative (we all know Big Tech does not like that...).

The best would be to have something like SMTP: the core is extremely simple and yet real-life-works everywhere, and via announced options/extensions it can _optionnaly_ grow in complexity.