[Jugglewhoa]

You keep attacking me thinking I'm a) a man and b) am the the "boogy" kind of man that fits the target of all this overeactive nonsense where having arguments about free speech somehow brings up rape. Hence the word "psychotic" not feeling out of place.

But just as well, while we're making unfounded assumptions: you should show this exchange to the only woman in your life. You could tweet it to her and show her how you so valiently defended her honor and solidified how important you are to her. Of course she would never see it and never care because that's how parasocial relationships work. No amount of hystrionics and virtue signaling will ever get her attention or her validation or the supplanted parental love that arguments like this suggest you desperately need.

[gait2392]

If you think ‘print this out’ is attacking then you are incredibly thinned skinned. Not only do you have no morals, you are also a coward.

[Jugglewhoa]

Lol you know at times like this I have to remember the words of my great great grandmother: "Never argue with a swiftie, because they're fucking insane and too dumb to know it"

[_lvbh]

I can kinda see both sides here. I definitely wouldn’t want people using AI to maliciously depict me beside Trump etc. However, I also don’t think people should be punished for thoughts or art, be it human or AI.

My own solution is to simply not appear online but I understand that’s not possible for celebrities.

How would you propose we solve the problem of AI generated desecration, if it even is a problem?