|
|
|
|
|
|
by sanderjd
880 days ago
|
|
|
Agree to (not entirely, but largely) disagree! It's funny that you used Go as an example. Like 60% of its raison d'être is noticing that more lines of code is often better if each line is simple. And I think it's mostly right about that. Its inscrutable naming conventions are, on the other hand, a poor choice. (Notwithstanding that java's are a poor choice in the opposite direction.) |
|
|