| Hmm, I’ve always considered tailwind like the spice to make css actually usable, kinda like elixir is to erlang, typescript is to javascript or C is to machine code.
Its still CSS just the stuff that you _actually_ want to build is pre-packaged and thought out for the use case. And I’m not dissing on CSS - just those tools try to solve different problems. CSS is the ground truth, and it kinda has to support all the weird edge cases and uses that tailwind doesn’t. Tailwind is like usability overhaul of css, but still allows you to “drop down to css” everywhere you want to. It can compose like css, but it also constraints you to what you can do. It also gives you tools to group, adjust, refine styles, but in a usable way. It’s a transpiled language on top of css, but more ambiguous than sass or less. Given enough time most projects I work with slowly gravitate towards small composable utility classes anyway, tailwind is just logical evolution of that. And since design peojects usually gravitate towards design systems in the long run, tailwind is really good at facilitating that. |
Would be nicer if you could do it like selector > color-xyz text0xyz paddifng-xyz and never add those classes inline