|
|
|
|
|
|
by jasonlotito
876 days ago
|
|
|
Apparently, something that can be replaced with the word "For". It's odd, because FAO takes a LOT more text to get it's point across compared to "For" even though technically they are both the same number of letters. Consider also that "For" sounds natural, but in this case, FAO does not. |
|
|