| I will certainly concede that it is a lot of friction. The mailing list is also very clunky, I will further concede that. And no matter how you slice it, this is all still community-hostile behaviour, I will also concede that too. I think part of the reason for all of this friction is precisely because they don't want to keep the barrier of entry that low. It's no secret that the Java community is *ENORMOUS*. Having a little bit of friction goes a long way in quelling the influx of repetitive discussion topics. I'm not saying that's a good excuse -- more so saying that there probably isn't enough incentive to take the effort to fix these friction points. And leaning into that further -- I'm not sure how much they are missing out on by keeping these friction points *on official Java discussion platforms, like the mailing lists*. The fact is, there are an influx of Java opinions being given on the internet with no help from the Java Team, and if they want to get the public opinion, these social media sites will have it within hours. So if they already have that, why take on the massive burden of opening the flood gates on their official community discussion platforms? Still, that's no excuse for things like no search function or the lack of moderator activity. It's probably something they have just de-prioritized in the name of getting features out faster. |
I will admit the system works if its goal is to prevent wasting OpenJDK devs time on repetitive topics.
I was going to ask one such potentially repetitive question (can't tell without search) but waiting for non-existent moderator to approve my message successfully drained any energy I had for this :)