[aulin]

Anyone who's ever interacted with any kind of animal knows how they are intelligent.

The lack of science on this matter is not the reason we still consume meat and more science won't change anything.

We've always found ways to justify/accept our need for meat and wel'll continue doing this as long as science doesn't find an equally nutritious alternative that can be produced at scale.

[rickydroll]

> Anyone who's ever interacted with any kind of animal knows how they are intelligent.

Anyone who's ever had backyard chickens knows they are not intelligent. Nature gave them a brain to keep the spinal cord from fraying.

[psd1]

I'm stealing that line!

But chickens have a social order, keepers say, and more complex behaviour than a naive city slicker might expect. They may not be grandmasters, but they aren't completely stupid.

[rickydroll]

That line also applies to some management types and children of the rich and powerful.

[sph]

In the words of Werner Herzog:

https://youtu.be/QhMo4WlBmGM?si=9rwaeU6DeaBPTQBN

[JohnMakin]

I’m not making any kind of statement as to why we consume meat or whether we should, just making an observation

[aulin]

Sorry, I wasn't really arguing against you. It's just that every time an article like this comes out everyone act likes it's a step towards abandoning meat. Unfortunately that's not so easy.

[sph]

It is perfectly possible to accept that we are meat-eating apex predators and still be in awe and respect of the intelligence of other life forms.