|
|
|
|
|
by M4v3R
884 days ago
|
|
Personally I have nothing against it (or to be more exact - I've given up hope for a Javascript-optional web) but I see the argument of people who keep it disabled because: – it consumes more battery and bandwidth (the latter still being expensive on mobile in some parts of the world; – it's often used to track you (including tracking everything you do - mouse movement, things you type into forms without even submitting it, etc.), serve you ads, and so on; – most security issues (XSS, browser-based 0-day exploits that escape the sandbox) rely on Javascript being turned on – it overall slows down many pages with no tangible benefit to the user (this one is obviously not always the case, depends on the website). |
|
It also eliminates most the incredibly annoying bits of the web: cookie banners, modal dialogs asking me to subscribe to newsletters, auto play videos.
On my phone 90% of the time I'm looking to read your content not interact with your spa. Enabling js is a 2 touch process if I need it.
I think it is fairly stupid on my part but it does add another layer of effort between me and doom scrolling