|
|
|
|
|
|
by ok_dad
883 days ago
|
|
|
You’re also never increasing the size of those slices right? So it’s better memory wise by a bit and maybe faster? I last used Go a while ago, but I recall the capacity was the length of the underlying array? Internally it may even reuse the same arrays for slices maybe, since they’re not changing size each loop iteration. Edit: weird, this was supposed to be an update to a previous comment I made, but this is a different comment now |
|
|