|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
876 days ago
|
|
> right, it's awkward, so don't do that, be functional instead. I feel like you're just saying that because you like functional code. I'm sure that when they've added syntax to make certain functional things easier to type, you didn't respond "it's awkward, so don't do that, write it in an entirely different way instead". Regardless of what is "better", which tends to differ based on situation, there was no need for the awkwardness. Classes weren't bad to use, it was just that declaring them had some pointless busywork. |
|
If you don't the only response I can have is to go learn it.
This isn't about functional being better, it's about functional being more fluid to use in javascript.