[bobthepanda]

Actually, tall towers have many more elevators. Usually a set of express and local elevators, because someone on the top floor should not have a ten minute journey on an elevator making all stops.

It’s why tall buildings taper as they get taller, to minimize the amount of people transported to higher floors.

[bravetraveler]

Physics probably has more to with the tapering than number of people transported

[bobthepanda]

number of people transported dictates how many elevator shafts are needed, and express elevators to the top mean less leaseable space on lower floors. so less people at the top means more leaseable space.

there is a lot of work going into optimizing elevators so that as few shafts can be built as possible while keeping wait times to a minimum.

[bravetraveler]

That's an understandable and interesting challenge

I can't think of a good way to say this, apologies if it comes across poorly.

I commented because it felt like cause and effect are backwards

Like, I'd easily believe it's more due to stability than being able to say "aw shucks, we wanted to put elevators there but we can't fit them"

It's like saying the skyscraper has an upside down pyramid to create a choke point. Just do that, don't fight physics too.

People don't go to floors just to fill the space, but the space kind of informs it. It's circular, as I ramble I understand better

[bobthepanda]

Developers are in the business of renting out space, so anything that reduces rentable space is bad for business.

It's also why tall towers only get financed during times of easy credit; they don't make much financial sense otherwise. Most supertall buildings take many years to reach full occupancy, if they ever do at all; it is why the World Trade Center complex has not been fully completed to this date.