It's often easier to not make a stupid decision than to make a good one. I think this approach is geared toward stopping stupid decisions, rather than actually making decisions. But there is some genuine value in that...
There is of course value in stopping stupid decisions, and every org should have some form of control for avoiding a director going completely crazy. But when you implement such independent compliance functions then how do you get anything done other than maintaining the status quo?
Think about developing a new automation project/feature that reduces some cost while increasing some risk in a controlled way. If you have a decision body with people who only own costs vs. people who only own risks you'll be in deadlocked forever.
Think about developing a new automation project/feature that reduces some cost while increasing some risk in a controlled way. If you have a decision body with people who only own costs vs. people who only own risks you'll be in deadlocked forever.