|
|
|
|
|
by nikanj
871 days ago
|
|
Deflation throws on the breaks in the economy, because X is cheaper if you postpone it. With X representing essentially all economic activities like buying a new phone / hiring a programmer / going on vacation / etc This would be great for the environment, but absolutely terrible for the economy |
|
Sometimes I think about this as promoting investment in cash. Deflation over time means cash yields a profit.
But since cash doesn't actually do anything, investing in cash instead of something else is harmful.
One implication of both of our comments is that unanticipated deflation is good. What causes problems is the reaction people take to anticipating that deflation will occur -- they wait it out -- not the fact that things are cheaper.
The necessary refinement would be that unanticipated deflation that comes from an increase in the amount of stuff is good, and unanticipated deflation that comes from a reduction in the amount of money is [?].
Introducing that dimension asks us to fill out the grid:
- anticipated deflation from an increase in the amount of stuff: [?]
- anticipated deflation from a reduction in the amount of money: bad