That's not really the point, the point is it's not an honest campaign. Elon Musk isn't donating money because he thinks Phillips will win, he's doing it because he thinks it'll help Trump win. Because Phillips needs to act soon, he can't wait as he says until Joe Biden appears unable to win. He needs to make that assessment in a week or two, before the general campaign even really starts -- so it isn't honest.
IMO it is fine to run for president, and to vote for whoever you want. But running a campaign that is really intended to just give the edge to another guy, is dirty politics intended to fool voters with an illusion of choice.
When the richest people in the country engage in those tactics, isn't democratic, it's plainly oligarchic.
I just learned about him and find his campaign platform to be agreeable.
Unfortunately, in a two-party system one is compelled to vote for the official party candidate if they want their party to win. So voting for a challenger during primaries is great in that it helps send a message to the party, but in the general one must hold their nose and vote for the party's nominee.
If he runs in the general election it will be as a spoiler candidate
So it's a dishonest campaign because some rich people are giving him money? By this logic RFK Jr's campaign should be seen as a dishonest campaign as well since he's raised more money from more people than Phillips has.
RFK's campaign is also a spoiler, propped up in part by the same people. My sense is what happened is they realized he's a little too crazy to be effective, so they are hedging their bets with Phillips.
If RFK ran as a third party he'd take votes from the Republican candidate, not the Democrat one. What kind of Democrat is going to vote for someone who believes vaccines cause autism and HIV doesn't cause AIDS?
> What kind of Democrat is going to vote for someone who believes vaccines cause autism...
Before COVID, I would have guessed the biggest reservoir of anti-vax sentiment was among very liberal Democrats (think the people who are super into yoga, organic food, and naturopathic doctors).
COVID became a culture war issue, which lead to partisan Democrats lining up on the pro-mask, pro-lockdown, pro-vaccine side, but I have no idea if that disrupted the views of existing anti-vax Democrats (of the "vaccines cause autism" variety).
There are people on all side that believe crazy stuff, and crazy=maverick to a lot of people. I know some left-leaning anti-vaxers. But you do appear to be correct.
>RFK Jr. pulls more votes from Trump than Biden in three-way race: Poll
I think your observation is why you read a lot more about Phillips these days than RFK.
RFK's promoters switched to promoting Phillips when they realized RFK was drawing more conservatives for the antivax stuff, than democrats for the Kennedy name.
Do you have any evidence of these claims? I have seen such tactics employed before (by Democrats and Republicans) but only rarely is there evidence of the altier motives.
IMO it is fine to run for president, and to vote for whoever you want. But running a campaign that is really intended to just give the edge to another guy, is dirty politics intended to fool voters with an illusion of choice.
When the richest people in the country engage in those tactics, isn't democratic, it's plainly oligarchic.