[C0mm0nS3ns3]

Why only voice chat?

[jrexilius]

No pics of a problematic nature, more anonymous (thus more approachable) I'd wager..?

[thimkerbell]

Yes. Text to a random person, and, maybe ask for optional keywords to match on, for slightly less random.

[shlant]

I assume because video is hard and/or expensive

[runlaszlorun]

Shouldn’t be with WebRTC, right?

I haven’t used it a lot but the scalability issues I’ve heard of with are due to the fact that p2p _group_ video is an n^2 problem by its nature.

[imhoguy]

It is quite simple with p2p WebRTC, like Jitsi did that, and perhaps still do.

[withinboredom]

yeah, what about people who cannot talk?

[hkt]

Maybe an IRC channel would be good. Libera (nee freenode) would seem like a natural home.

[sourcegrift]

What would you propose? Video? What about people who are invisible? Just because you haven't seen anyone as such doesn't mean they don't exist.

[C0mm0nS3ns3]

He probably meant text. Which is what I had in mind when I asked the question too. Text is way cheaper than audio and you can opt in audio after an text ice breaker.

[withinboredom]

Wow. Mute or deaf people are real, invisible people are not.