|
|
|
|
|
by mden
883 days ago
|
|
Isn't having a private entity be able to do what previously required a nation a good sign for that nation? The idea that the USA cannot re-obtain that capability again seems silly to me and there are a lot of pros for having private companies pushing the state of art forward. |
|
The gov is slow b/c it requires sign off from hundreds of people. (For example, congress approving NASA's budget).
As a private entity, maybe 20 or 50 people are required to approve or reject missions. This lets them move faster, but if a certain CEO doesn't want to provide services for a war, they can mess with the contract.