|
|
|
|
|
by addicted
887 days ago
|
|
If the intent of Congress is clear Congress can simply pass a law to clarify that. Congress does exist. If an agency is acting against the will of Congress Congress can immediately stop it. You don’t need courts to come in and tell the agency what Congress means when Congress is right there and meets far more often than the courts and has a much quicker process than the courts, where decisions may go up the court chain all the way up to the supreme court. |
|
Congress is different every year. The totality of congress members that negotiated and passed the law is likely no longer seated. Also this suggestion completely circumvents presidential veto power. It's also highly prone to abuse.
>You don’t need courts to come in and tell the agency what Congress means when Congress is right there and meets far more often than the courts and has a much quicker process than the courts, where decisions may go up the court chain all the way up to the supreme court.
That's literally what the SCOTUS is for, to interpret laws.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-governm....
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/flash-car...