|
|
|
|
|
by lupusreal
885 days ago
|
|
Given that this is the internet and I don't know you, how can I distinguish a sane person making well founded claims backed by hidden evidence they won't share with me, and a crazy person just being paranoid and seeing conspiracy where there is none? Usually the evidence is what makes the difference, but if you can't/won't share the evidence then what good are the accusations? |
|
Not to mention opening myself up for the possibility of being sued by one or more contributors for "slander". I chose this approach and won't budge on that - it's not a fairy tale that people are dying and everything is affected by it, the list of embargos is considerable.
Consider that you are connected to the world - including Russia. Would you trust your Russian neighbour if he pivoted his development style, opinions, pace, characteristics? No.
Have a great weekend. Thank you.