Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by valeg 884 days ago
Second that. OpenBSD is a good choice as well. No reason at all to burden GNU/Linux with all that legacy stuff.
1 comments

But "burdening" *BSDs is fine? :-P
OpenBSD might work accidentally, but NetBSD intentionally supports old hardware. Now why someone wants to run current software on museum-piece hardware is quite beyond me though.
> NetBSD intentionally supports old hardware

So does Linux (486SX is the minimum supported CPU), there is nothing inherent to NetBSD about supporting old hardware than the developers wanting to do so.

> Now why someone wants to run current software on museum-piece hardware is quite beyond me though.

I can think a lot of reasons, e.g. keeping them useful. While there are many things that old hardware cannot do, there are things it can do as long as there is software to provide the functionality.

AFAICT the article isn't asking writing new software that runs on the old hardware, it is asking to let existing software that could run on the old hardware remain accessible.

BSDs are complete operating systems, Linux is just a kernel