|
|
|
|
|
by wpietri
5165 days ago
|
|
How do you deal with the Dunning-Kruger effect? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect The short version is that people who are good at things generally get that way because they have a strong ability to tell good work from bad. People who are bad at things can't tell the difference, so they a) have a hard time improving, and b) think their low-quality work is pretty swell. Is your culture perhaps unusually frank? Alternatively, is it very supportive in a way that makes critique more comfortable? Might you have a formal (or informal?) mentorship program so that people get useful feedback? Are there peer groups that meet around particular skill areas? E.g., do visual artists get together regularly to show recent work and discuss it? |
|
lower skill -> higher confidence in ability (overestimation) higher skill -> lower confidence in ability (underestimation)