Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by eru 887 days ago
You already have shanty towns with all the regulation.

Making housing cheaper also means making higher quality housing cheaper.

3 comments

We don't really have shanty towns in the states. We definitely don't have a Kowloon Walled City, which is an example of what can happen when no regulations are involved (and somewhat remarkably not burn down and kind of thrive even if still a slum).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kowloon_Walled_City

If only we can have something between a McMansion filled North American suburb and Kowloon Walled City.
Hong Kong is super dense and super expensive, Shanghai is similar, but at Mainland Chinese prices. I'm all for density, but anyone who thinks that density alone solves affordability issues simply hasn't travel enough.
Density is a way to deal with expensive housing. Not a cause of it.
Density is a way to make cities more livable and attractive, and to scale up public transit investments.

After you've done all this, you'll find that your city is more expensive than the surrounding cities without, not less.

> We don't really have shanty towns in the states.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tent_cities_in_the_Uni...

Tent cities != shanty towns. Shanty towns are like semi-permanent buildings, tents are just...tents you buy at REI and then set up at the park with your stuff. We had one nearby my house at the Seattle Ballard commons that lasted during COVID (and is gone now). I wouldn't have called it a shanty town like I saw in the Philippines.
Go to skid row in LA. Going on 50 years or more.
Eh, Skid Row is pretty famous, but if you're willing to broaden the definition a little the US has lots of slums [0].

[0]: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/08/more-am...

Maybe it's OK if some housing is less perfect and closer to ashanty town. I'd rather live in a shanty town than a cardboard box under the freeway. If nobody wants to live in the "shanty town" nobody will move in and no investor will want to build another one. I sometimes think that the provocative way of putting all this is that we need more slum lords. They filled a need.
> Making housing cheaper also means making higher quality housing cheaper.

Or, much more likely, builder profits higher.

Nothing wrong with that.

Competition will sort that out.