[beaeglebeached]

They should sue as anyone else can for goods back, if they have proof they own it .

[parl_match]

There have been many articles written about this, you should read them. But in some of the more egregious cases, I would ask you this: how do you sue a government for plundered art when the government has passed laws that prevent you from suing the government?

[beaeglebeached]

You're talking about publicly possessed (stolen or not) art where the public won't vote to allow consideration of patriating the art abroad?

[parl_match]

You said lawsuit. In many countries, a lawsuit is not feasible.

[beaeglebeached]

I said sue, not lawsuit. In some countries you use a lawsuit. In others, it merely means to seek legal redress such as petitioning a dictator.

[parl_match]

Suing is the same as bringing a lawsuit. You're ineffectually splitting hairs. Still likely not effective. What's your point?

[beaeglebeached]

You've pointed to 'many' countries and also to laws stopping this. Now you've evaluated likelihood. Since you were able to drive a likelihood calculus, what specific laws were you calculating against?

[vkou]

Impose tariffs on their exports.