|
|
|
|
|
by pjc50
880 days ago
|
|
Like a lot of conspiracy theory, there's a core of truth. All you have to do is ask the question "is this system going to be allowed to be used for crime on a huge scale", receive the obvious answer "no", and infer that there will be some control built into the system. Where it leaps into conspiracy is the question of when and whom this will be used against. But it's fairly obvious that measures will be taken against drug sellers, sex workers, banned political parties and so on. |
|
> But it's fairly obvious that measures will be taken against drug sellers, sex workers, banned political parties and so on.
Yeah, of course like governments already do with cash!
There's a big difference between saying “governments are going to police things” (which is always true, that's their purpose in fact) and spreading made up claims involving a central bank's conspiracy (spoiler alert: policing isn't part of central banker's job, if somebody is going to do anything it will not be them but the plain and boring law enforcement agencies, but that sounds less bad as a conspiracy to say that police is going to police stuff, I guess).
If anything, a technology like Taler is a big improvement in terms of individual freedom compared to things like credit cards. If governments want to stop cash to combat crime (and save money, the logistics around cash is very expensive) having Taler instead of Visa is a massive benefit for privacy and freedom.