|
|
|
|
|
by vasilipupkin
884 days ago
|
|
no, the disagreement is about whether the fact that Israel exercised some control over Gaza strip after it withdrew can count as "military control over Gaza strip"
In plan English, it's plainly absurd. If I own 10% of the stock of a company, nobody would say I have control over this company
But even if these arguments had any merit before Oct 7th, it's clear after that they make no sense. You can't claim with a straight face that Israel had military control over Gaza strip. It plainly did not, which is why Hamas was able to build a tunnel network and succesfully execute these attacks. And if it didn't have military control, that means it wasnt an occupation by definition of what an occupation is. |
|