|
|
|
|
|
by OzzyB
5164 days ago
|
|
I don't think your off-topic at all. I think your point speaks to the core of the issue at hand, which is, companies only want to hire folks who have mastered a particular skillset that they only deem important to them at that specific point-in-time. I don't for one minute think there aren't enough people who can't do "data driven analysis" or whatever it is that companies find important "today". Companies just don't want to invest their time and money in creating that someone who will be able to do the specific thing that they need. They always seem to think that someone will be "out there" to solve their specific need, and all it takes is a job posting on some job board. Take a note from the old record label industry, that would have A&R departments, who would take on an individual artist who had merit, and then nurture them to become the world-class musician that makes them a ton of money. |
|
It was, then, a matter of knowing what to look for in new talent and finding ways to bring out their strengths through good and appropriate songwriting. People these days often complain about the quality of music being lower than it used to be, but the truth is that for every hit of the early times there would be many times the number of "duds" and just unsuccessful attempts that would either be mediocre songs or bad matchings between the artists and the records they perform.
IMO, despite even that, I still personally think records of the past are a lot more full of substance and soul than anything released today.