Man, everyone at work is going to be really bummed when I tell them that some guy on the internet has invalidated our empirical evidence of acceptable accuracy and performance with assumptions and appeals to authority.
I did not say it would not work, nor that it couldnt be acceptable performance for a given task.
Just that its peak performance is lower than an end to end model, and that if youre going to encourage model kit-bashing be clear how you communicate it, so people dont make human centipede architectures and wonder why feces is what comes out the end.
I was a very polite enough "some guy on the internet". Thank you.
Just that its peak performance is lower than an end to end model, and that if youre going to encourage model kit-bashing be clear how you communicate it, so people dont make human centipede architectures and wonder why feces is what comes out the end.
I was a very polite enough "some guy on the internet". Thank you.