|
|
|
|
|
by FarMcKon
886 days ago
|
|
We had 14 regional / internal to the US airlines in the 80's. We had 10 airlines in the '00's. We have basically 4 or 6 national / regional airlines now. "JetBlue's biggest problem remains their access to airports, if they were able to get more access to that they would likely be a serious threat to the bigger airlines." That is like 'Their political party is cheating, we need to cheat bigger to win". That is leaning in to making the situation more and more rigged, more and more of a failed market / system. I will leave it as an exercise to the reader to go read about how less players in a market bad for competition. Matt Stoller is a good place to start. JetBlue can bid for slots at an airport, like anyone else. If bigger airlines are blocking them, lets fix that market to be competitive, NOT "let's help the market degrade into Oligopoly faster". |
|
This seems to be a common theme in politics. A bad decision was made by the previous generation. Now the current generation, seeing that the decision was bad, makes decisions that should have been made in the first place. The problem now is that the bad decisions have already been made, and what at one point would've been a good decision is now either exacerbating the problems caused by the bad decisions or is at best failing to remedy them.
It comes up a lot in healthcare and immigration for example. What constitutes good policy is highly conditional on the current state of the world.