|
|
|
|
|
by rising-sky
885 days ago
|
|
> Rivals on average cut prices 7% to 11% when Spirit enters a market[1][2]. The same cannot be said for JetBlue > “If JetBlue were permitted to gobble up Spirit — at least as proposed — it would eliminate one of the airline industry’s few primary competitors that provides unique innovation and price discipline,” Young wrote. “… Worse yet, the merger would likely incentivize JetBlue further to abandon its roots as a maverick, low-cost carrier.”[2] > This could really crush M&As in America. That's a bit hyperbolic. If it does crush anti-competitive / anti-trust mergers, that's a win in any capitalist's book [1] https://money.usnews.com/investing/news/articles/2024-01-16/...
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2024/01/16/jet... |
|
> That's a bit hyperbolic. If it does crush anti-competitive / anti-trust mergers, that's a win in any capitalist's book
The judge literally ruled here that a very small market (1/3 of customers on a small airline) would be harmed. JetBlue was also willing to discuss divestures & the government refused because they didn't care about competition or working with JetBlue. They have been doing weak cases for the past few years in hope to get any precedence set that makes M&A harder.
The judge uses the DOJ's expert witness's findings even after agreeing with JetBlue's team that the witness's model was completely broken.
This was a pro-competitive merger in my opinion because it created a stronger rival for the big 4, albeit still roughly half the size of most of them.